• Yaky@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Also it doesn’t help that, for example, at U-Haul, employees just use their personal phone to scan a QR code and take pictures of your ID.

    • toynbee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      14 hours ago

      My local hospital apparently requires their employees to use a “secure” app on their personal phone to transmit data on the patients.

      Seems like irresponsible handling of PHI (by the administration, not the staff) to me.

      • sudoshakes@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Work in IT, alongside info security. Nah.

        A secured app environment on a phone is plenty well secure for medical data. It is preferred strongly over a web based solution. Having a personal device running a company profile of security compliance monitoring and conditional access is as good as a company device provided by the hospital. They would do literally the same thing.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      15 hours ago

      this idea that employees can expect you own and use a personal smartphone as part of the job irks the heck out of me.