• stenAanden@feddit.dkOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      But Johnny Depp is a drug addicted, alcoholic, wife beating rapist.

      Don’t you think that’s worse than being a relatively minor celebrity at the receiving end of the aforementioned rapist, wife beater?

      • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        24 hours ago

        There has been a weeklong trial that has established he’s not and amber heard is extremely manipulative and abusive.

      • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 day ago

        Except he is not. Otherwise you disagree with a weeks long trial, an incredibly patient judge, a number of jurors, the alternates, most of the legal commentators, and basically most of the evidence.

          • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            15 hours ago

            And you just blindly trust the statement of a single person (who really doesn’t look perfectly trustworthy) to the point you frame the other person as a monster without good evidence. Now who’s acting “a bit rich”?

            My god, what a load of bullshit this whole post is. This is some “frontpage of a magazine at the kiosk no one with half a brain should ever buy” stuff.

            • stenAanden@feddit.dkOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              No. I have actually examined the case and realized that Amber Heard is innocent and Depp is a rapist.

          • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            15 hours ago

            No, trusting the legal system would be reading “guilty” and stopping there.

            I have seen more than 200h of motions and trial live. I have also seen independent opinions. I have seen evidence. I have seen articles corroborating my conclusions. And ultimately I also have trust in the judge as well as the jurors who delivered this verdict (I think they were individually polled but I’m not sure).

            Rich would be to have such a minority opinion that you hold and asserting everyone should think like you.

            I don’t, I think it’s good that there’s other opinions than mine. Doesn’t mean I have to agree. But such is nuance.