• Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    While it’s nice to use a bit less sand, charring at 350°C doesn’t sound like negligible energy usage. Especially if done with fossils. Always good to have options, I guess?

    • Aeao@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Last I heard we are running out of sand to use in concrete so it might not be an environmental thing just a cost. Like they can’t just use any ol’ sand. Beach sand is too smooth or something so it has to be river sand I believe.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Other way around. Beach sand is new and this rough. A surprising amount of it is parrotfish poo, chewed up coral. River sand, and desert sand, is weathered and smooth.

        I’ve seen a machine for pulverizing glass bottles into basically sand. Smooth desert sand > glass packaging, used for food, glass packaging > concrete aggregate?