Saying that AI changed it is burying the lede. The real story here is that one of those political grassroots lobbying services is using AI to forcibly invert the message of people who try to use it to send opposing messages. That’s way more deliberate and nefarious.
This isn’t bad autocorrect; this is intentional subversion.
I was making a joke that what you picked up on as linked-in like was their correct spelling of lede. Most people write “lead,” but referring specifically to newspaper articles (not investigations), it’s “lede.”
Saying that AI changed it is burying the lede. The real story here is that one of those political grassroots lobbying services is using AI to forcibly invert the message of people who try to use it to send opposing messages. That’s way more deliberate and nefarious.
This isn’t bad autocorrect; this is intentional subversion.
That’s honestly quite crazy. You’re completely right, I don’t think this is a hallucination.
Your comment reads like a LinkedIn post and it pisses me off
Sorry, I guess? I don’t use LinkedIn and I wrote it myself. I just talk like that.
I have found it in my heart to forgive you, though I cannot promise that grace again; tread carefully (I hope I didn’t hurt your feelings ❤️)
Just because nobody spells lede right doesn’t mean a comment with the right spelling is intentionally professionalized, lol.
Huh? Not sure I follow
I was making a joke that what you picked up on as linked-in like was their correct spelling of lede. Most people write “lead,” but referring specifically to newspaper articles (not investigations), it’s “lede.”
Oh! Too early for me haha, I misread your comment (still woulda missed the joke, honestly)
For me it’s the phrasing more than anything