Problem solved

But…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2_zb6oyep8

Do you need a specific game mechanic for that? Surrender, being a type of talking, is a free action.

I don’t have much tolerance for capsaicin, but I’m all about the isothiocyanate (the pungent compound in wasabi/horseradish/Chinese mustard/etc., and yes I had to look it up for this comment).

You need to do a Ron Swanson-style “I said I want all of the chilis you have” routine.

Yeah, we could have had a nice conversation, if you had ended your initial reply to me a sentence earlier. But you didn’t, did you? No, instead, you tried to turn your failure to say what you meant around on me as if it were my fault, in an attempt to save face at my expense. Did you really think you weren’t going to get called out on it?

There is only one person “failing to engage in an even remotely constructive way,” and that’s you, not me.

Its multiple states plus some countries too.

That only underscores how imperative it is to fight against it, and that fucking fascist traitors like Poettering disregarding the community by fiat are the last thing we need!

I did respond to the point, in my initial comment. Your lack of reading comprehension (and dishonesty!) is your own problem, not mine.

You weren’t “clarifying;” you were backtracking and lying about it. That’s a detail that matters.

First of all, it’s not my list. Check the usernames of the comments you’re replying to.

Second, you didn’t make any sort of distinction limiting which ones you were talking about before, which means that you expressed that none of them were relevant. You don’t get to move the goalposts and then pretend it doesn’t address your point because of that.

Third, that sloppiness and failure to pay attention is only reinforcing my initial impression.

Fuck Brazil’s law.

What I want is for them to signal non-support for the fuckery instead of signaling support for it!

I don’t want them to comply at all, and just say people in Fascist California can’t use their software anymore instead.

The PR attempting to revert the fascism-compliance change was the one that was closed without being merged.

You are completely missing every single part of the point.

What part of don’t comply in advance with fascism is so difficult to understand?

If you’ve been working as a software engineer for years and things like error handling and data structures (let alone git and testing!) are not relevant to you, I fear for your employer’s codebase.

The main reason to not including python is that students aren’t particularly in the CS field, they are learning it as their “augmented skill” (I don’t know what it’s called bad English). That’s why I don’t want to force them to learn CS concept which they might not even need.

That’s an even better reason to pick Python, then.

Neither. Teach them Scheme. They need to start by building good habits (functional programming).

“Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.” ― Pablo Picasso

Admittedly I haven’t used Omada even though my gear supported it (before I flashed OpenWRT on it), but I don’t think it bears any resemblance to Ansible except in the most basic sense of being able to accomplish administrative tasks somehow.

What I was expecting was something that would provide a web dashboard showing all of my OpenWRT (and ideally, misc. other devices) at once, maybe with a nice diagram of the network topology and stuff like that.

I think that’s a common defense.

It’s not. Or rather, it is something people commonly try, but it doesn’t work. The court system is designed by lawyers, for lawyers. The idea that a contract isn’t valid just because a non-lawyer can’t understand it categorically does not fly with them.

Does there exist something more appropriate?