• pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    2 days ago

    More simply, replace uptime with downtime.

    99% uptime and 99.9% uptime seem close.

    1% downtime and 0.1% downtime is clearly a 10x difference.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Rather than guess at which percentage representation is more intuitive to people, the blog post suggests something more concrete:

      instead of: GitHub Actions: 98.31% uptime.

      We say something like: GitHub Actions: 12 hours affected in the last 30 days (98.31% uptime).

      I’ve been presenting numbers to people for a long time and I know they flip back and forth between “these percentages are abstract - what’s the actual total number?” and “how do I put these totals in perspective? What percentage is it?” The blog post suggests offering both, which is the right choice.

    • HelloRoot@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Why not just give hours/minutes per year/month??

      I have no intuitive feeling for what 0.078% is, but if it says: “average downtime of 44 minutes per month” or “7h per year” it’s clear as day.

      • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Percentage is good to see quick changes in relation. Having exact figures would be nice too, but that is not a replacement for percentage.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Also in addition 99 is interpreted in the brain very close to 100. That’s why we have prices like 99.99. Just an additional thing to your excellent reasoning about the 10x difference look.