From what I have heard/seen, there’s one major difference: the battlefield runs on an economy of sorts. Bullets, respawns, vehicles all have a cost, while actions will pay you. Killing someone gets you money, but driving a squad near a poi will also net you money. Transporting supplies, reviving someone, clearing out mines… basically everything gives you money, so there’s a huge incentive to do other things outside of just shooting and killing (the usual best way to farm score points in other games like this).
I’m not playing it either! Although I do like shooters, the battlefield genre has never been that attractive to me. Also, right now I have Valheim to play/no life!
From what I have heard/seen, there’s one major difference: the battlefield runs on an economy of sorts. Bullets, respawns, vehicles all have a cost, while actions will pay you. Killing someone gets you money, but driving a squad near a poi will also net you money. Transporting supplies, reviving someone, clearing out mines… basically everything gives you money, so there’s a huge incentive to do other things outside of just shooting and killing (the usual best way to farm score points in other games like this).
so… Planetside 2
Yep, pretty much. But in a modern setting instead.
That does seem like an interesting game mechanic. I suck at shooters though, so it probably won’t end up on my list. If you’re playing it, have fun!
I’m not playing it either! Although I do like shooters, the battlefield genre has never been that attractive to me. Also, right now I have Valheim to play/no life!
Valheim… oh oh, there go 1-2k or your life hours. Have fun!
Isn’t that pretty much how Arma Reforger also functions?
I don’t think ARMA Reforger works quite the same way, but I haven’t played that game either.