HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoVoid Linux maintainer orphans 100+ packages over AI policy disputewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1120cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.mllinux@programming.devlinux@lemmy.worldlinux@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1120external-linkVoid Linux maintainer orphans 100+ packages over AI policy disputewww.phoronix.comHaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square31fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.mllinux@programming.devlinux@lemmy.worldlinux@sh.itjust.works
minus-squareadr1an@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 day agoI just skimmed over the text. That’s just a lot of words for saying “no ai”. Personally, I like debian’s approach more. They put some granularity of levels as to when and how much ai assistance can you take. But I can totally see that void, being the profile of users and devs they got, would prefer to be way more radical.
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoA lot of it is very explicit definitions so there’s no ambiguity, and reasoning to explain why. None of the reasoning is quality of the code, which is what most people assume is the reason.
I just skimmed over the text. That’s just a lot of words for saying “no ai”.
Personally, I like debian’s approach more. They put some granularity of levels as to when and how much ai assistance can you take.
But I can totally see that void, being the profile of users and devs they got, would prefer to be way more radical.
A lot of it is very explicit definitions so there’s no ambiguity, and reasoning to explain why. None of the reasoning is quality of the code, which is what most people assume is the reason.