• TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Most of the ticket sales would have probably come from Asia. They love blockbuster movies that let them just turn their minds off and enjoy the spectacles to make them forget the tough and hectic everyday life. Despite the rising income of Asians (which is why Hollywood patronise Asian audiences because the latter is a huge customer base), they are overworked and both the standard and cost of living is still bad. We don’t really realise how good we have it in the West with better social and labour protections and we are not socially expected to work extra time. My Indian colleagues said they don’t celebrate Fridays the way we do, because many of them are expected to work on the weekend unpaid.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Someone in Asia is probably typing a similar comment about how westerners only like mindless kung fu movies.

        I think the reason why people like the more “mindless” movies that have more action and little talking has more to do with the language barrier. If it’s dubbed, it seems silly. If it’s subtitled it means missing some part of the performance because you’re constantly alternating between looking at faces and looking at text. Cool action scenes are cool action scenes no matter the culture and language.

        You may be shocked to learn the Mr. Bean is a very popular comedy in a lot of Asia. Do you think that it’s only Mr. Bean that can make them forget the tough and hectic everyday life? Or maybe it’s just because Mr. Bean doesn’t have a lot of dialog?

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Also how is this movie doing so well? I feel like it’s only popular because it has Nolan’s name on it and stars a bunch of A-list celebrities. But the film itself was mid as fuck. I fell asleep in the theater two hours into it.

      Was it even close to the books? IDK never read them. (Also, that poor giant cyclops didn’t deserve to lose his eye. They could have just snuck away while it slept.)

      • boonhet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I haven’t seen the movie yet but the cyclops losing its eye was definitely in the poem and kinda important to the plot.

        If you actually want to read it at some point, try Emily Wilson’s translation, it’s said to be one of, if not the most readable version because it doesn’t force fake olden English on you and uses a rhythm scheme that reads better in the English language. And she’s now translated Iliad too.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Well if it was important to the plot, then that only futher goes to show how bad the film was, because they didn’t make that apparent at all. In the film, after the giant passes out the exit is left wide open for them to simply sneak away. But instead they form a bizarre plan to wake him up and piss him off by stabbing him in the eyeball, just so they have a reason to run for their lives and learn that it speaks English. It made no god damn sense at all.

          Thank you for your suggestion. I hate when old literature is translated by pompous pricks just to make it more difficult to read for the sake of it, so I will definitely check out Emily Wilson’s version.