LibreTechni.ca
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
xkcd bot@lemmy.worldB to xkcd@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month ago

xkcd #3298: Aerospace Flowchart

imgs.xkcd.com

message-square
53
fedilink
319

xkcd #3298: Aerospace Flowchart

imgs.xkcd.com

xkcd bot@lemmy.worldB to xkcd@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month ago
message-square
53
fedilink

xkcd #3298: Aerospace Flowchart

Title text:

Someday, we will find the problem that goes with this solution.

Transcript:

Transcript will show once it’s been added to explainxkcd.com

Source: https://xkcd.com/3298/

explainxkcd for #3298

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    i disagree. you could build catamaran-style airships.

    that sounds far more expensive and more dangerous.

    not worse though, that sounds way cooler.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Building a worse airship is still building an airship.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          And name them Akron and Macon.

          • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            i was going to name them after match companies but i like your idea

            • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Oh you must be European, if you’re concerned about fires aboard airships. American airships don’t burn; we’ve never been stupid enough to use hydrogen as a lifting gas. USS Akron and USS Macon both crashed, much of the crew of one froze to death and the other proved surprisingly survivable. Compare that to the Hindenberg or R-101.

              • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                No we use good old fashioned methane yes sir patented blimp gas here

                I have spent the last year trying to find copies online of a musical some friends wrote while I was in college. It’s called Hindenburg: Oh the Humanity!

                • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I’ve heard of methane used to inflate gas bags to lift sunken boats but I haven’t seen it used as an aviation lifting gas.

xkcd@lemmy.world

xkcd@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !xkcd@lemmy.world

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 204 users / day
  • 461 users / week
  • 1.26K users / month
  • 5.12K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 17.9K subscribers
  • 370 Posts
  • 3.55K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • koraro@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org