Interesting how he mentions LLMs have a 50% error rate, and predicts how no one will pay for a tool with such a poor rate.
You must log in or register to comment.
Here a comment on this from usernomdeguerre on hacker news (ycombinator.com).
“His” and “GKH” refers to Greg Kroah-Hartmann, who is maintainer of the stable kernel series and the speaker in the video.
I’ve included a few slides into text that i thought were eye-opening to me:
From his Kernel Recipes 2026 slide on Mythos
Mythos's 79 vulnerabilities: 24 - no detail at all "something crashed" 14 - not a bug at all 3 - totally made up data 15 - already fixed in latest release - 11 by others - 4 by anthropic 20 - fixes were needed - 7 "assume a malicious filesystem image" - 2 "assume you can inject a malicious network packet into the middle of the stack" - 2 "NOMMU" - 6 sctp networking issues for untrusted devices - 2 ipv6 minor network issues - 1 gpu driver for local malicious userGHK called this “10 ‘real’ bugfixes”, which to me sounds like there’s a wild hype machine around these companies and uncritical parroting of every press release they make that falls apart when you engage the affected real experts.


