• robear@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    I love solar, but we can’t pretend it’s without its own challenges.

    A utility scale solar installation comparable to an average fission plant would take 15 square kilometers. Not to mention how complicated the infrastructure to actually transmit that power is.

    Space is only one challenge though. You have no energy production at night, and energy generation can drop by half to almost three quarters during winter at higher latitudes.

    fusion companies are essentially giant bubbles of debt owed to venture capital currently

    There’s a couple of loud, commercial fusion companies sucking up VC money, but all the serious projects are nationalized (China) or are projects run by public institutes with government funding (EU).

    • davetortoise@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Agreed, a 100% solar grid is unrealistic. A healthy mix of nuclear and reneweables with a strong energy storage buffer is the way forward imo.

      • robear@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        So then you need 15km² to cover the day, another 5-10km² to cover the night, and then however much space and lithium it’s going to take to store all that energy.

        And this still doesn’t solve the problem once you’re a little too far off the equator.

        • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Sodium ion, ammonium/hydrogen production, elevated hydro, compressed air, etc. There are lots of options that are being built up. There is also a lot of desert in the world. It would be a major undertaking but it’s possible.