For context, I have been using a pretty niche OS on my phone for a long time but recently the community and the 3rd party appstores are flooded with LLM content - and fans. Its ethical, geopolitical and societal dangers are handwaved away at best, or ridiculed or countered with stupid non-arguments (“you wouldn’t tell a farmer not to use a tractor”).

Everybody is in a hurry to churn out the next pretty port of an Android app.

The actual OS devs have not taken any sort of public stance, not even in comments.

And it got me thinking. If this continues maybe LineageOS & F-Droid (no Gapps of course) might turn out to be a better alternative again, despite it being essentially Android and Not True Linux.

But how do they position themselves with AI?

If you want to suggest a 3rd option, please do so - but only if it works reliably as a daily driver - incl. telephony and messaging - on at least a small number of consumer devices that are no older than 8 years.
And only if they clearly position themselves against AI in code and generally.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.socialOPEnglish
    4·
    2 days ago

    apps seem like they were most likely made with AI.

    Thanks but I was thinking about their actual policy, regarding.

    that means somebody would have to be manually monitoring it and investigating

    I don’t think we have to go that far just yet.
    Speaking from experience, there’s quite a bit of self-policing within such communities; a clear positioning from the project helps a lot.