fyi: it’s “drugs”

  • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    There is a huge, giant fucking massive difference between someone that would plausibly commit rape and someone who has committed rape.

    The main difference is in one case, someone gets raped.

    • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, yeah. There’s a huge difference for the victim. But I wouldn’t say lack of opportunity is a moral victory for the would-be rapist.

      • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Brother really had no argument.

        “Erm you use the wrong there/their. The’refour your argument is invalid”-ass response

        • velma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I just think it’s interesting that even in that short comment, you avoid assigning blame to the rapist and instead choose the passive “someone gets raped”.

          Kinda like when cops shoot people. It’s always “person of interest was shot” instead of “the police shot the suspect”.

          • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Hey can you do me a favor real quick? Please go back and read the sentence immediately before the one you’re talking about. Specifically the part that says “someone who has committed rape.”