slothrop @lemmy.ca to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-22 days agorapist rulelemmy.caimagemessage-square288fedilinkarrow-up137file-text
arrow-up137imagerapist rulelemmy.caslothrop @lemmy.ca to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square288fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredeltapi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 day agoDoes it make more sense if it’s presented as If a woman goes to a party, she won’t be raped unless there’s a rapist there. This holds true even if she’s on drugs and naked. Because the drugs aren’t the point
minus-square𝕲𝖑𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍🔻𝕯𝖃 (he/him)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 hours agoThat phrasing makes more sense, but has less shock value.
Does it make more sense if it’s presented as
If a woman goes to a party, she won’t be raped unless there’s a rapist there.
This holds true even if she’s on drugs and naked.
Because the drugs aren’t the point
That phrasing makes more sense, but has less shock value.