slothrop @lemmy.ca to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-22 days agorapist rulelemmy.caimagemessage-square288fedilinkarrow-up137file-text
arrow-up137imagerapist rulelemmy.caslothrop @lemmy.ca to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square288fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarelate_pessimistic@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 hours agoI meant “yes means Yes!” principle that some advocate for. I believe this is the source I first heard the idea from Article: https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/08/the-dangerous-insufficiency-of-no-means-no/566465/ Without paywall: https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theatlantic.com%2Fentertainment%2Farchive%2F2018%2F08%2Fthe-dangerous-insufficiency-of-no-means-no%2F566465%2F Basically the idea is that “No means no” is outdated and doesn’t cover majority of rape cases where no one technically says no. The updated one to replace “No means no” is “Yes means Yes!”, also called affirmative/enthusiastic consent or something.
minus-squarevelma@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 hours agoAh see I was in the mindset that “yes means yes” is the current consent shorthand. Thank you for the links!
I meant “yes means Yes!” principle that some advocate for.
I believe this is the source I first heard the idea from
Article: https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/08/the-dangerous-insufficiency-of-no-means-no/566465/
Without paywall: https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theatlantic.com%2Fentertainment%2Farchive%2F2018%2F08%2Fthe-dangerous-insufficiency-of-no-means-no%2F566465%2F
Basically the idea is that “No means no” is outdated and doesn’t cover majority of rape cases where no one technically says no.
The updated one to replace “No means no” is “Yes means Yes!”, also called affirmative/enthusiastic consent or something.
Ah see I was in the mindset that “yes means yes” is the current consent shorthand. Thank you for the links!