Epzillon@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agono one can understand AIlemmy.worldimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up137 cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up137imageno one can understand AIlemmy.worldEpzillon@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square37fedilink cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-squareEpzillon@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·21 hours agoYes, it is inherently incorrect, I just think that increases the fun factor. It reminds me of that guy who wrote a prime-checker for his thesis and it was just a massive list of if-statement
minus-squareweps@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28·19 hours ago98% accurate prime checker, super fast isPrime() return False;
minus-squareRhaedas@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up6·20 hours agoA transistor is on or off. It’s all if-then.
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-219 hours agoNo, it’s more elemental: it’s all ands , ors and nots
minus-squarenop@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·18 hours agoBoolean math let’s you convert it all to nand gates. For ease of manufacturing this is what is done.
Yes, it is inherently incorrect, I just think that increases the fun factor. It reminds me of that guy who wrote a prime-checker for his thesis and it was just a massive list of if-statement
98% accurate prime checker, super fast
isPrime() return False;
A transistor is on or off. It’s all if-then.
No, it’s more elemental: it’s all ands , ors and nots
Boolean math let’s you convert it all to nand gates. For ease of manufacturing this is what is done.