3 other AI image detectors said it was real. Now, I have absolutely no expertise and no knowledge of which ones are best or anything! Regardless, I think trying to use pictures or video/audio as even mild proof is really going to suck going forward…
I believe you, it’s just weird that the first 3 results for these tools didn’t detect the watermark, even though they specifically mentioned OpenAI, among other models.
I agree with you, it’s bugging me what parts of this image were generated. Especially with the original source being Reddit was this somehow scraped and got the watermark applied like a reposted jpeg?
Will drive me nuts if I can’t tell this shit apart anymore.
Counterpoint:
3 other AI image detectors said it was real. Now, I have absolutely no expertise and no knowledge of which ones are best or anything! Regardless, I think trying to use pictures or video/audio as even mild proof is really going to suck going forward…
Synthid is a watermark openai adds. Its very definitive.
I believe you, it’s just weird that the first 3 results for these tools didn’t detect the watermark, even though they specifically mentioned OpenAI, among other models.
I agree with you, it’s bugging me what parts of this image were generated. Especially with the original source being Reddit was this somehow scraped and got the watermark applied like a reposted jpeg?
Will drive me nuts if I can’t tell this shit apart anymore.
Goddammit
Sus result. This could be a 4-5 year old image posted to r/oddlysatisfying
If the OP pic is generated you got me, looks legit
Kinda what I was thinking but the tool says there was a watermark…? Knowing what’s real now is a fucking chore/drag