• ozymandias117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Arch is just the most popular one where that would happen. Most distros don’t have that issue; it’s an artifact of the simplistic packaging that Arch uses.

      I don’t happen to know how Gentoo handles it, though

      • Kristell@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah, I don’t either, and I don’t attach USB drives very often. I’m now tempted to try it, but I’d have to wait for the next kernel update, and I will 1000% forget to do it by then

      • esc@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Arch package manager isn’t really simplistic? Maintainers can mitigate this easily, just goes counter arch philosophy.

        • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          They’ve been bolting on more complex use cases, but keeping packaging simplistic was their stated goal 20 years ago

          It’s not a bad thing, but missing modules for the running kernel on updates is one edge case new users might not expect

          • esc@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Reboot is a recommended choice on any linux system after kernel upgrade (systemd as well).

            It’s not a simple package manager and it can do a lot, not on the level of zypper but it’s pretty complete. There are some intentional limitations, true.