• Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s an arthouse movie with a major Hollywood franchise budget. There’s pretty much no way this would actually make financial sense. But you have to give them credit for taking a creative risk. That’s far too rare these days.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Thanks for sharing! That was very insightful!

        For the folks who cannot/don't want to open it,

        It’s because in the past, things like DVD sales were a massive second chunk of revenue, but now most of the revenue needs to be made in the theater.

        I do wish he spoke a little more about it though.

        • MunkyNutts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I didn’t think of that. So a basic, boiled down synopsis of the clip, Damon says:

          With the advent of streaming, movies that weren’t expected to be block busters and make most of their money in theaters, relied on a second wave of revenue from DVD sales which made the film more lucrative, and more viable to make the more artsy movies (or as I see it dramas, which are my preferred genre).

          edit: haha, shit didn’t notice your spoiler