It’s the same on reddit. The demographic seems to have very narrow ideas about who ought to be having sex with whom. If there’s no minors, and no harm, then let people do what they want.
That’s true, but “grooming” is a question of morality. it’s a specific term involving people are under the age of consent. It’s not “grooming” just because you find the relationship immoral.
A loving relationship where the woman is older than the man, oh the horror.
Everyone knows real power is from geriatric men marrying children who were trafficked just for them.
It’s the same on reddit. The demographic seems to have very narrow ideas about who ought to be having sex with whom. If there’s no minors, and no harm, then let people do what they want.
When they met, she was 40 and he was 15.
Adults meet minors all the time. Some teachers will meet hundreds in their career. What’s your point ?
While that may be true, teachers having relations with minor pupils is generally rife for abuse.
I missed the “having relations with minor pupils” part sorry.
Grooming. Look it up. Grooming doesn’t immediately involve sex.
He was already over the French age of consent when he met her.
Legal ≠ moral.
That’s true, but “grooming” is a question of morality. it’s a specific term involving people are under the age of consent. It’s not “grooming” just because you find the relationship immoral.
Are you proud of yourself for trying to sanewash child rape?
I don’t think she raped him. She groomed him, 100%, but she likely didn’t rape him.
You’re going to have to point out the child rape part to me.
Maybe read up on how they met, why he moved schools etc. before exposing your ignorance.
He was of age?
Do you think he feels like he was raped?
He was 15