• fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Do you mean the Soli radar? That ended up in what, 2-3 phone models altogether?

      Most phones do not have motion sensors.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        No literally a common motion sensor.
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_sensor

        Quantum sensors have applications in a wide variety of fields including microscopy, positioning systems, communication technology, electric and magnetic field sensors.

        One of these are the perfectly common motion sensor that detects if you move your phone, which is based on quantum phenomenon, like the phase shift between photons send in different directions.

        • fonix232@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          19 hours ago

          None of the current phone IMUs utilise quantum phenomena for measurement. They’re MEMS/FOG/RLG systems.

          Quantum IMUs are the size that requires rack mounting.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            OK but still the GPS using timing based on an atomic clock in space is absolutely sophisticated, and that is in even the cheapest smartphones today.

            • fonix232@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Your claim was quantum phenomena utilisation in phone sensors.

              Let’s stop moving the goalposts please.

                • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Read your own links!

                  First link: “But your smartphone is not a quantum computer, yet”

                  The title was a question. The answer the article you linked gave was “it doesn’t use quantum.”

                  The second link was describing regular effects as having quantum origins. Which is everything! Everything everywhere has a basis in quantum mechanics.

                  "Radio waves are photons, and their behavior is described by quantum electrodynamics. "

                  Yes, underpinning the entire universe is quantum mechanics. The light from a campfire is photons. No one would write an article saying, “Cavemen used a sophisticated quantum light source.”

                  Your claim was that smartphone motion sensors were quantum. You linked to Wikipedia about quantum sensors which did not say anything about phone sensors.

                  Apple and all phone manufacturers say they use mems motion sensors.

                  You were wrong. Get over yourself.

                  And read the links you provide as proof.

                  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 hours ago

                    First link: “But your smartphone is not a quantum computer, yet”

                    I never claimed that it was, quantum computers are still experimental.
                    Sorry I didn’t care to read the rest, because you started off with such nonsense.

                    This is also in the text:

                    Also, your smartphone contains a digital camera with a CCD-sensor. This sensor is based on the photoelectric effect – which was explained by Albert Einstein by introducing quanta of light,

                • fonix232@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Okay, now you’re literally just chewing words to become meaningless.

                  On this basis, every fucking piece of technology is quantum technology because guess what, the ENTIRE UNIVERSE WE FUCKING LIVE IN is adherent to quantum physics and mechanics, and anything, any technology, any kind of energy transference, can be broken down to some kind of quantum phenomena which would be either directly or indirectly used. A simple steam engine can be quantum. Your bedroom lights - regardless if you use LED, incandescent, neon, or a fucking candle.

                  The very definition of a quantum sensor is that it utilises a quantum effect DIRECTLY, instead of relying on a transitive property that we measure in a different way. A CCD sensor might rely on “a quanta of light” therefore making it “quantum technology”, but it won’t be a quantum sensor.

                  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    12 hours ago

                    You are annoying and uninformed, by far the most of the universe as we perceive it as human beings is Newtonian.
                    Now piss off with your ignorant crap.

          • DeadDigger@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            I mean everything electric is a quantum sensor not to defend anything

            edit: further g sensors and accelerometers implemented by piezoelectricity are quantum sensors. They just use materials that make the sensing easy

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              17 hours ago

              If the device doesn’t use quantum effects directly, it isn’t a quantum sensor.

              Otherwise words have no meaning and textbooks would call 1860’s steam engines electric quantum engines because materials are held together with electric effects and atoms have quantum properties.

              • DeadDigger@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Well everything uses quantum effects directly at least the highs field like you said. Your definition is therefore bad. But the examples do use gravitons because they measure gravity the same a camera uses photons to measure light, which are both quants and are measured in “easy” ways. Just because you are posh about it and try to define it as only the large hardron collider