ValueSubtracted@startrek.website to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 10 days agoHe followed a debunked conspiracy theory to claim a tax refund. So why did the CRA agree to a $40M payout?www.cbc.caexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up123
arrow-up123external-linkHe followed a debunked conspiracy theory to claim a tax refund. So why did the CRA agree to a $40M payout?www.cbc.caValueSubtracted@startrek.website to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·10 days agoI don’t think the CBC can say “fraudulently” because fraud is a crime and he hasn’t been charged, let alone convicted. “Allegedly” doesn’t work, because the facts aren’t in dispute. But I agree, “erroneously” also seems wrong. They probably should have just left the adverb out of it.
I don’t think the CBC can say “fraudulently” because fraud is a crime and he hasn’t been charged, let alone convicted.
“Allegedly” doesn’t work, because the facts aren’t in dispute.
But I agree, “erroneously” also seems wrong. They probably should have just left the adverb out of it.