CBC took extensive precautions to protect this sensitive data throughout its investigation.
They say as they plaster a guys name and face and what he reported while he’s saying he’s afraid of retaliation. Could they not have ran this story without adding him to the story?
They say as they plaster a guys name and face and what he reported while he’s saying he’s afraid of retaliation. Could they not have ran this story without adding him to the story?
I think one can reasonably assume that he consented to being identified, since the CBC regularly protects anonymity.
Why he consented, considering his concerns, is a valid question.