Link to post with banned comment
The lemmy.ml admins couldn’t handle someone pointing that any conversation about Palestine should be centered around the Palestinian victims undergoing a literal genocide and not on Judaism, because in the present day Jews are just privileged white people who aren’t facing any systemic oppression but are even systemically privileged.
An instance pretending to give a voice for the the Global South in the end just censors non-Eurocentric opinions to the point of censoring for genocide.
Apparently they didn’t instantly delete the comment after banning me but did so hours afterwards, probably because others agreed with me.
This part of the post pertains a feddit.uk post which I assumed was a crosspost but this was not removed by the lemmy.ml admin and this part can be ignored. Leaving it here for reference
The admins feddit.uk mods also removed a post from my own community because the post cites TheDailyMail and that is not a “reliable source” despite the headline being completely verified including a link to the UK government report itself. Might as well introduce MBFC next.
Here is TheGuardian saying the same thing: Government expected to accept recommendations of review, which found three in five Jewish students had experienced prejudice. And here is an even more extensive debunk of the report found on the “ultra radically left” /s Hasan Piker subreddit
Do you know who this OP is? They were one of the biggest names out of .ml and personified every boogeyman people have about them: constantly argumentative, never responded to what anyone else actually said, forced their ideology down everyone’s throats, constantly misrepresented situations and articles to their own ends. They will argue anything extreme just to goad people like at one point they supported rape as a viable and justified act at one point provided it’s against the right people.
They go banned from their favourite instance and are mad about it. I mean, c’mon, are we really going to gloss over where they want the Daily Mail taken as a valid and reliable source just because the article has a link to something else, as if it’s not possible to editorialize information and the Daily Mail doesn’t have a long and proven track record of doing just that?
Even below, they aren’t posting that Daily Mail article they posted and got banned over, or tried to justify in the OP. It’s another, more agreeable, article entirely.
I don’t. I recognize a few names here and there, but I really just come here to doom scroll and post the odd cat pic. I don’t get hung up on usernames, suspected alts, etc. I mostly try to stay out of drama unless I’m feeling a bit spicy that day and need an outlet.
Your entire message is adhominems and then you admit that there is nothing wrong with the daily mail article. Most of the times people complain about me it’s the .ml admins removing their comments or banning them on my communities, but anyone who did get banned by me absolutely deserved it.
Ad hominems are for counterarguments, not isolated descriptions of one’s character.