No they fucking didn’t. Being ingnorant is fine, what makes you fucking loathsome is the arrogant assumption you’re right about things you know nothing about
They do not touch on your argument at all. I am becoming worried for your increasing rate of hallucinations. Consider going outside and decompressing until you are in a calmer emotional state where you can handle people disagreeing with you
Dismissing an argument is not an ad hominem. What an ad hominem is has been explained.
Just because I disagree with you means I must be wrong all the time?
You keep Inventing strawmen. You are wrong all the time because the things you are saying are wrong. For some reason you attach a personal relationship to that.
Yes they did. And it’s still virtue signaling nonsense. Just because you made it on paint with shapes doesn’t mean it’s not slop.
No they fucking didn’t. Being ingnorant is fine, what makes you fucking loathsome is the arrogant assumption you’re right about things you know nothing about
They do not touch on your argument at all. I am becoming worried for your increasing rate of hallucinations. Consider going outside and decompressing until you are in a calmer emotional state where you can handle people disagreeing with you
By not addressing the argument they are dismissing it. Just because I disagree with you means I must be wrong all the time? Get over yourself.
Dismissing an argument is not an ad hominem. What an ad hominem is has been explained.
You keep Inventing strawmen. You are wrong all the time because the things you are saying are wrong. For some reason you attach a personal relationship to that.
marked by or being an attack on an opponent’s character rather than by an answer to the contentions made
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ad hominem
Ad-hominem is not just a synonym for “insulting” you fucking idiot
Correct. And they are not marking your argument. Just like me calling you a dumbass genocidal fascist isn’t marking your argument.
Right so rather than address the argument at all they simply attacked my character… sorry that it’s a buzz word or whatever but that’s what he did.
When your character IS the argument, no one is ignoring the argument.
Wrong.
They simply described you, and you thinking that is an “attack on your character” is pretty revealing