• shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    You want the government running search?! That’s an absolute horror show; you see the impossibility of neutrality.

    Here in Florida, “homosexual teen” would lead to sites about conversion camps. We might just score a Democrat in the governor’s mansion today, so that would change. And then change again. Imagine the non-stop public fight over what is and is not appropriate to show in a search. AH! (I’m actually having a giggle thinking about such fighting. “Trannie” would lead to results about transmissions one year, a transexual slur the next, banned altogether the next.)

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      At least there would be a non-stop public fight over it, instead of just having to swallow whatever the corpos which captured the government want to put in their search result.

        • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          If search was provided by a government run by a functioning country with strong democratic roots - AKA the west excluding the US - political parties messing with search would cause them to lose voters. Bribery only increases that effect in an actually working structure.