• TWeaK@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s incredibly hard to be a vegan in korea, but it’s very easy to be a vegetarian.

    A lot of traditional foods have hidden animal products in it like shrimp paste for seasoning.

    Sounds like it’s easy to be a pescatarian, but not actually a vegetarian.

    • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Restrictive Asian diets don’t sort neatly into western buckets.

      By your definition, most practicing ‘vegetarian’ Buddhists are omnivores because of oyster sauce, yet they eat far less animal products than the average western vegetarian due to the low prevalence of dairy products.

      Jains, for example, can drink milk and eat butter and ghee, but cannot eat root vegetables, fungi, and fermented foods, while the opposite is true for veganism.

      So what do you call people who are vegetarian except for 1% of their diet? I would find it disengenuous to equate that to a regular omnivore diet.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Again, it’s kinda weird. I would say it’s fairly easy to be vegetarian since there’s a cultural understanding of vegetarians due to the cultural/religious practices of Buddhist monks.

      For one, they typically have more bland foods, and typically live in the mountainous regions where there’s less access to sea food. And again, what a lot of east Asian people consider meat varies from the western nomenclature.

      Where instead of basing the ethical delineation on a scientific taxonomy, it’s based more on whether something possesses a soul/conscious. If we examine the issue through that lens it can make sense that an invertebrate like a krill or even coral are closer to plants than mammals.