RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-23 天前vegan rulemedia.piefed.zipimagemessage-square319fedilinkarrow-up1239
arrow-up1239imagevegan rulemedia.piefed.zipRmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-23 天前message-square319fedilink
minus-squareShanmugha@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 天前*the less humans are on the planet, the lesser footprint we leave. It should be handled this way but alas, we are not even close
minus-squarebetanumerus@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 天前The reason we take care of a fish tank, is to maintain the fish.
minus-squareShanmugha@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 天前We did not setup the planet to plant humans here now, did we?
minus-squareShanmugha@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 天前Exactly. So what are you trying to say with that fishtank?
minus-squarebetanumerus@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·20 小时前It allowed us to be here so don’t mess with it.
minus-squareShanmugha@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·20 小时前Exactly. Like I said, the fewer of us, the lesser our strain on everything around
minus-squarebetanumerus@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-220 小时前If your goal is to reduce “strain on everything around” (whatever that means), it looks like either a: you starve people, or b: we reduce our fossil fuel consumption. I’d choose b.
minus-squareShanmugha@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·20 小时前B is not a solution. Nor A is needed. Come on, it’s not rocket surgery
*the less humans are on the planet, the lesser footprint we leave. It should be handled this way but alas, we are not even close
The reason we take care of a fish tank, is to maintain the fish.
We did not setup the planet to plant humans here now, did we?
You did not setup a planet.
Exactly. So what are you trying to say with that fishtank?
It allowed us to be here so don’t mess with it.
Exactly. Like I said, the fewer of us, the lesser our strain on everything around
If your goal is to reduce “strain on everything around” (whatever that means), it looks like either a: you starve people, or b: we reduce our fossil fuel consumption. I’d choose b.
B is not a solution. Nor A is needed. Come on, it’s not rocket surgery