KhitomerAccordion@lemy.lol to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 9 hours agoYou sure about thatlemy.lolimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1101
arrow-up1101imageYou sure about thatlemy.lolKhitomerAccordion@lemy.lol to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 9 hours agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squaresp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-26 hours agoIn terms of computational power, no, wrong. In terms of aesthetic style, yes, correct.
minus-square0xDREADBEEF@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-24 hours agolove the aesthetic of disposable, cheap, commoditized plastic. Really screams “consumerism”
minus-squareSchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 hours agoDisposable? You can reuse them for your next build usually. Cheap? Not really. Commodotized. Well the interior yeah, but not the exteriors.
minus-squaresp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 hours agoNice thing about PC cases is that you can, with a bit of modification, put new stuff in an old shell. Do that, and now you’re either being ironic, retro, or just actually recycling.
In terms of computational power, no, wrong.
In terms of aesthetic style, yes, correct.
love the aesthetic of disposable, cheap, commoditized plastic. Really screams “consumerism”
Disposable? You can reuse them for your next build usually.
Cheap? Not really.
Commodotized. Well the interior yeah, but not the exteriors.
Nice thing about PC cases is that you can, with a bit of modification, put new stuff in an old shell.
Do that, and now you’re either being ironic, retro, or just actually recycling.