• MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 days ago

      LLMs use the wrong language cues. They spend a lot of words emphasizing an utterly mundane point, and it’s difficult to read because it’s constantly winding you up to reveal some arcane knowledge just to drop knowledge bombs like, make sure you use good names for variables and always handle your exceptions. I’ve seen them spend two paragraphs when a short sentence would do.

      • bruh@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think they are improving on this too, some latest models give pretty terse answer for example

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Just generally it waffled on, and didnt get to a point.

      That makes this a useful comparison, not a verdict

      Thats the “its not X, its Y” pattern.

      Not so fast.

      • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        That makes this a useful comparison, not a verdict.

        Plus all the other constant flip/flop contrasting throughout the text. It’s like a comparative decision matrix converted to prose, and exhausting to read.

          • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            Fortunately I disallow javascript execution by default, so I often don’t see this crap. Of course, about half the time I don’t see images or the article content either, since delivering text or images is apparently completely impossible without running arbitrary code.

            I seem to vaguely recall we used to have some sort of hyper-text markup language that could do all that, but I guess I must’ve imagined it.