14 years of development does not imply good or efficient. There’s no secret about it, keeping it on permanent development gives them a job for as long as they can keep the grift going. You’re implying everyone thinks the game is good, worthwhile or innovative, I do not agree on most of those points. That said again both things can be true.
No, you’ve added your opinion and tried to pass it off as objective fact.
It doesn’t need to be that deep, it’s just fraud with a fan base which could be said of a lot of games just none this expensive or developed as long.
You mean the paragraph that was very clearly written as sarcasm to highlight the inherent contradiction in your theory? Would that be the part you’re referring to?
I do not think any of those things therefore they weren’t in my argument, that’s your argument at that point. It’s a red herring you wrote yourself, it is odd you’re confused by it though.
Correct.
14 years of development does not imply good or efficient. There’s no secret about it, keeping it on permanent development gives them a job for as long as they can keep the grift going. You’re implying everyone thinks the game is good, worthwhile or innovative, I do not agree on most of those points. That said again both things can be true.
No, you’ve added your opinion and tried to pass it off as objective fact.
It doesn’t need to be that deep, it’s just fraud with a fan base which could be said of a lot of games just none this expensive or developed as long.
Where did I say that?
Again, where did I say that?
I’m honestly wondering if you replied to the wrong comment by mistake, because I can’t see how you got any of that from what I said.
Literally “good at everything they do” aside from stick to a release date obviously.
All you had to do was look for the word good in your comment boss.
You mean the paragraph that was very clearly written as sarcasm to highlight the inherent contradiction in your theory? Would that be the part you’re referring to?
I do not think any of those things therefore they weren’t in my argument, that’s your argument at that point. It’s a red herring you wrote yourself, it is odd you’re confused by it though.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod