• frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    20 hours ago

    To be clear, the system picked out faces in the crowd, in the “yes, this is a face” sense. They were labeled in what appears to be random terms like positive, kind, nostalgic, bee keeper, gif animator, extreme ironer. No personal identification.

    • scarilog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah this article is hot garbage. What “biometric data” are they talking about??? Just images of people’s faces? My understanding is that it’s super commonplace in public locations, are people really that surprised?

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Technically it’s not until it’s quantified and hashed, it’s just an image. Until measured, it’s not metrics.

          • stink@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It’s very easy for even a private citizen to get a lot of information from someone just by using a picture of their face.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yes, while its generally common on this platform, we are early adopters for tech so we understand it first. The general public gets exposure much slower, especially when there is efforts to subvert it for profit.

        Attention and time are limited, those that focus on tech know things first. Its the same as a chef knowing about food more than the average person.

    • trailee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Oh that’s very interesting. I didn’t get that nuance from the article. Do you have a link to more info?