☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 day agoRing’s CEO says his cameras can almost ‘zero out crime’ within the next 12 monthswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1112
arrow-up1112external-linkRing’s CEO says his cameras can almost ‘zero out crime’ within the next 12 monthswww.theverge.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareFoxyFerengi@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up55·1 day agoCountries with extensive cctv networks still have lots of crime, almost like surveillance is the wrong answer to lowering crime or something
minus-squareshiftymccool@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·17 hours agoIt’s a good answer if your goal isn’t actually to lower crime but you say it is so you can add buttloads of surveillance for data gathering
minus-squarecrunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 day agoIt’s a good answer if you want to watch all the crime that’s still happening
minus-squarebirdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·20 hours agoUntil police selectively disables some cameras whenever it goes outside.
minus-squarephilophilsaurus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoHonestly if we want crime to go down we should just stop reporting it.
minus-squareGoodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·22 hours agoHow much good did it make in all these years before tv?
Countries with extensive cctv networks still have lots of crime, almost like surveillance is the wrong answer to lowering crime or something
It’s a good answer if your goal isn’t actually to lower crime but you say it is so you can add buttloads of surveillance for data gathering
It’s a good answer if you want to watch all the crime that’s still happening
Until police selectively disables some cameras whenever it goes outside.
Honestly if we want crime to go down we should just stop reporting it.
How much good did it make in all these years before tv?