• toynbee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    1 day ago

    … You must be one of my co-workers. Except that we just delete ours rather than labeling them.

    • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      We needed to label them because the requirement was not only that we don’t click them, but that we use the “report phishing” function on them.

      Also some of them were pretty funny.

      • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Was it hoxhunt? It’s a bit spammy but they seem to push for a more gamefied approach over collective punishment.

        • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not in my case, no. The content was completely custom to the organisation. I assume they were big enough that they felt like a lot of the risk would come from coordinated spearphishing carefully crafted to look like genuine corp email.

      • toynbee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        In my case, the phishing tests originated with the organization that owns my employer, rather than within my employer itself. Our email states are entirely distinct so, while we can report the emails, no one would ever care.