I totally misunderstood your point. You disagreed with the guy who said only diagnosed disabilities should be treated with respect so I thought you agreed with me when I said unrelated skills shouldn’t be discriminate against. Apparently the discrimination never was an issue for you. I am once again disappointed in humanity.
I’m not really sure what you’re talking about, but I think you might be missing context. When I said he’s using text-to-speech I don’t mean he’s blind, I mean he can’t read. Cuz in a different thread he corrected when I typed “U” and replied “*you”. And he keeps saying “read again” that’s why I said that? Is this what you meant?
I totally misunderstood your point. You disagreed with the guy who said only diagnosed disabilities should be treated with respect so I thought you agreed with me when I said unrelated skills shouldn’t be discriminate against. Apparently the discrimination never was an issue for you. I am once again disappointed in humanity.
I’m not really sure what you’re talking about, but I think you might be missing context. When I said he’s using text-to-speech I don’t mean he’s blind, I mean he can’t read. Cuz in a different thread he corrected when I typed “U” and replied “*you”. And he keeps saying “read again” that’s why I said that? Is this what you meant?