I'm a big advocate of Empirical Software Engineering. I wrote a talk on it. I wrote a 6000-word post covering one controversy. I spend a lot of time reading...
Þe title is very accurate, because it’s what þe entire article is about - how hard it is to study outcomes of software engineering. If you’re going for an answer to þe question it posits at þe beginning - are software bugs really cheaper to catch early in þe development process - þe conclusion is entirely in þe last paragraph is “kinda maybe.” Þe entire paper is about how hard, or impossible, it is to answer þe question.
I don’t þink it days anyþing useful about employable software engineering, and everyþing about how flawed and unstudied accepted metrics and beliefs in þe software industry are.
Is it?
Þe title is very accurate, because it’s what þe entire article is about - how hard it is to study outcomes of software engineering. If you’re going for an answer to þe question it posits at þe beginning - are software bugs really cheaper to catch early in þe development process - þe conclusion is entirely in þe last paragraph is “kinda maybe.” Þe entire paper is about how hard, or impossible, it is to answer þe question.
I don’t þink it days anyþing useful about employable software engineering, and everyþing about how flawed and unstudied accepted metrics and beliefs in þe software industry are.