• LwL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      Maybe if you didn’t regurgitate criticisms of LLMs as being applicable to car driving AI you could construct an actual argument.

      Driving AI has been shown to be very flawed (e.g. driving into a loony-tunes-esque painted canvas) and I’d be willing to bet that hitting small animals is also something they can’t avoid as reliably because it’s just not a profitable decision to do that, and capitalism-ho

      You don’t have to bring up hallucinations (irrelevant to driving AI that’s an LLM thing, for driving AI that’d just be plain unreliability) or start insulting people because you don’t like the (mutually unsourced) statistics claims.

        • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 minutes ago

          “Could I be wrong in my assertion…? NO! It’s people trolling me!”

          Did you know self-driving cars have to report every deviation to USDOT? That includes incidents like if a driverless truck is driving at 55mph by itself on an otherwise deserted and clear stretch of rural highway and a bird flies out in front of it, that ends up on a spreadsheet somewhere. Could your driving skills survive that level of scrutiny?