Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-24 个月前The Economist on using phrenology for hiring and lending decisions: "Some might argue that face-based analysis is more meritocratic" […] "For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing"lemmy.mlimagemessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1405file-textcross-posted to: latestagecapitalism@lemmygrad.ml
arrow-up1405imageThe Economist on using phrenology for hiring and lending decisions: "Some might argue that face-based analysis is more meritocratic" […] "For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing"lemmy.mlArthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-24 个月前message-square117fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: latestagecapitalism@lemmygrad.ml
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/38830374 tweet economist article archive.is paywall bypass https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrenology excerpts of economist article: […]
minus-squareBrutticus@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·4 个月前Why stop there? Why just banks and hiring firms? why not allow access to Law Enforcement and use the phrenology robot to screen for pre crime?
minus-squarepotoooooooo ✅️@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 个月前Why not just use phrenology on babies and get rid of the problematic ones right from the start?
![The Economist on using phrenology for hiring and lending decisions: "Some might argue that face-based analysis is more meritocratic" […] "For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing"](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/14f5a0b4-82b6-498d-a689-36c2824dd296.png){kind=link}
Why stop there? Why just banks and hiring firms? why not allow access to Law Enforcement and use the phrenology robot to screen for pre crime?
Why not just use phrenology on babies and get rid of the problematic ones right from the start?