Edit: Thanks for your kind comments on disabling contributions. I’m aware of the possibility, this is just a meme.

Contributions in open source projects are great, needed and make the world a better place after all. Therefore they should be declined politely, optionally by giving a reason.

I hereby inform you that I will no longer accept contributions to this post /s.

  • Slotos@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 day ago

    Every bit of code a maintainer accepts becomes their responsibility to maintain. Considering that half the time „improvements” don’t even have tests to help maintaining them, feel free to maintain your own fork.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Sure, one can request those PRs to add those tests before merging.

      Don’t get me wrong, I can understand why someone wants to just share without collaborating, but I don’t get why they would publish in a collaborative environment, and then make memes about people trying to collaborate with them.

      Personally, as someone writing FOSS for a while now, I’m always happy to get anyone helping out and get demotivated when nobody cares. Being actively hostile to actual code contributors, is just fucking bizarre to me.

      • Ethan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I make my code open source and public so people can use it if they find it useful, not because I expect anyone to contribute.

        And there’s a big fucking difference between actively hostile and “I’m not interested in accepting this change”.

      • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 day ago

        While I do agree GitHub is a place where people collaborate, it’s also a pretty handy place to store stuff without having to host your own. If the project doesn’t invite people to contribute, don’t expect a polite response forever. It’s like stopping your neighbor on the street corner to tell them they should paint their house white for the thermal benefits, yeah people collaborate on the street, yeah you are right, it’s their house though.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Github provides ways to both display code just as is (archive mode) and to also disable issues and auto-close all PRs with a message.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Is archive mode the appropriate tool for this? I would assume that’s for when a repo is no longer receiving any updates from anyone, not just when the owner doesn’t want others contributing.