• lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      hah.

      personally i think a big part of the problem is that real-name identification for things that shouldn’t need it is just sort of accepted, rather than being criticised as the massive invasion of privacy that it is. whether it includes children or not is a side note in my mind.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          well, we’re here. but the companies and governments pushing this are already looking at possible next steps, like building systems where your real identity is used everywhere.

            • lime!@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              maybe. when china did it with their law about children not using their phones after curfew, they handled it by building a face database of everyone except children, then matching against that.

                • lime!@feddit.nu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  also a very useful way to mask your true reason if your true reason is “i want to build a database of people”. four horsemen of the internet type shit.

                  • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    Yes but I don’t think anyone but the ccp is capable of actually doing that competently at the scale of a large country. Maybe ten years ago google might’ve had a shot.