• MajinBlayze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Wolves have an intelligence of 3, few beasts “more mindless” would be aggressive enough to face tank the party.

    I guess all I’m really saying is that there really isn’t that much in the game that should stand and deliver against the closest enemy until it dies

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      OK, when I said “beast” I should really have said “monster”, because things like oozes, constructs, and undead are often stupid enough to do just that

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It was clear what you meant, but you left an opportunity for someone to be technically correct and they jumped all over it

      • MajinBlayze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, fair enough; seems we’re saying the same thing then. I really got the impression from the initial comment that only uniquely smart things would use tactics. I can see how that might have been meant more broadly