The codenames for every major Debian release are named after characters from Pixar’s Toy Story franchise. Debian’s unstable release is fittingly named after Sid, an unstable character from the Toy Story movies.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 months ago

    Their app names were one of the main reasons I disliked KDE for a long time.
    It’s just objectively impractible when half the software installed on your pc starts with the same letter.
    But Gnome and Xfce aren’t any better in that regard.

    • Strykker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 months ago

      Gotta say though it’s kinda nice when you run an update to be able to tell ah yes KDE apps are being upgraded when you see the wall of Ks

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Is gnome that bad? They seem to have been moving away from weird names for many years now.

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          In the branding, but the name of the installed applications in the UI do not contain “gnome”.

          • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            It’s not just the branding, it’s the actual command.

            Do you want to launch the hardware monitor? gnome-system-monitor. The terminal? gnome-terminal. And so forth.

            Your DE They will give these clearer and easier names to search from the menu, as well as more recognisable icons, but that’s not on Gnome

            Still makes the command slightly more of a PITA

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Do you think DEs just have a huge list of package names to app names, or how do you imagine this would work?

              In reality, it’s of course fully on Gnome, as it’s part of their code. Nobody except for Gnome has anything to do with the name that’s being shown.

              • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yes, they’re called .desktop files and they’re found in /usr/share/applications.

                On my Linux Mint machine, if I open the Applications menu and go to the Accessories tab, there’s an icon that says “Text Editor.” There is no binary on the machine by that name; it launches Xed.

                When the common name of a package, the actual filename of the executable binary, and the icon title in the App menu are all different, it’s not great.

                • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  No, your Desktop Environment doesn’t have a huge list of package names to app names. It has a list for all your installed packages, but the list entries are part of the packages.

                  If your system doesn’t have gnome-system-monitor installed, you won’t have the corresponding .desktop file, because it’s part of the package. It would be incredibly wasteful and unnecessarily complex for your system to get shipped out with .desktop files for all possible applications.

                  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Sure. But we don’t just exist in the context of the machine currently in front of us. Beginners might, Wade might, but consider this:

                    I use Linux Mint right now. An “everything but the kitchen sink” kind of distro, GTK3 based, ships with a combination of Gnome’s utility apps and several of Mint’s Xapps. In the App menu, there’s an icon that says “Text Editor.” It launches a program that resembles Notepad but a little better. If I switched to KDE but didn’t like KATE and wanted Mint’s Text Editor, what would I type after sudo apt install to get it? How do you learn that it’s Xed? It doesn’t call itself Xed anywhere in the GUI.

                    What do you think Seahorse does? Either you already know this, or you have to look it up, you’ll never guess what it does from the title. I’ll give you no hint whatsoever: It’s Gnome’s equivalent of Kleopatra.

                    spoiler

                    Those are both credential managers for things like PGP or SSH keys, things like that. Why KDE didn’t call theirs “Keyring” I’ll never understand.

                    There’s so many bad ways to name software, and the Linux ecosystem has tried them all. WINE Is Not Emulation or LAME Ain’t an Mp3 Encoder. I still believe GNU would have a kernel if Stallman had put the effort coming up with HURD/HIRD into writing the actual software. If you had to guess, what does Caja do? We live in a world where Nautilus and Nemo are two versions of the same thing.

                    The various text editors, ranked from best name to worst name: Gedit, Xed, Leafpad, Mousepad, Pluma, KATE. Gedit, it’s from Gnome because of the G, and it’s an editor. Xed contains the same information but you have to have more in-depth prior knowledge, you have to know Mint and their Xapp initiative. Leafpad is better than Mousepad because the latter might be a mouse/cursor configuration utility. Pluma…plume > feather > quill pen > writing > text editor. Wow what a journey. Why would I independently come to the conclusion that KATE stands for KDE Advanced Text Editor? Call it Ktext.

                    I would rather them call it Gedit than gnome-text-editor because they’re willing to put “Gedit” on the title bar of the window, they won’t put “Gnome Text Editor” up there.

              • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                I did think it worked like that but the package maintainers setting these does make more sense. Thanks for letting me know!

                I also edited my comment to reflect this

    • bitfucker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I never understood this argument. Why does having common first letter bad? If you mean subjectively then sure, it may not be for everyone, but objectively?

      • Hule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because if you want to start them by typing their names, autocomplete kicks in later.

        • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          There’s a solution for that tho: Tags. If you have sane (default) tags, you type ‘terminal’ and konsole pops up. And I feel like KDE mostly has that.

        • saigot@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think it can be helpful to separate “built in” gui tools with everything else, having them all under one letter accomplishes that.