iamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 20 hours agoIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...reddthat.comimagemessage-square102fedilinkarrow-up1532
arrow-up1532imageIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...reddthat.comiamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 20 hours agomessage-square102fedilink
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoYes, if you do silly things with JS, you generally get silly results instead of TypeErrors. I wouldn’t say that makes the language bad. It makes the language resilient to bad programming, which you’d generally want in the case of web pages.
Yes, if you do silly things with JS, you generally get silly results instead of TypeErrors. I wouldn’t say that makes the language bad. It makes the language resilient to bad programming, which you’d generally want in the case of web pages.