Valve’s unique approach to corporate governance is probably the reason why it’s such an efficient company.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I mean, it doesn’t exactly take much to run Steam…

    They make a few games, but it’s less making new games and supporting a handful that have been around decades by now.

    The reason they have such market dominance, is Gabe isn’t insanely greedy. He has more than he’ll ever spend, and I’d love to see him do more with the massive wealth he has.

    But it’s not like he’s fucking over users to squeeze what would be an unnoticeable amount more. So people hang around.!

    I’d hate to guess the number of people who have dropped over a grand through Steam

    • truthfultemporarily@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They could definitely lower their 30% cut for indie devs. Even just making the first 50k free would be huge (epic takes no cut for the first million).

      • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Going to take a metric fuckton of work to vet.

        Better: Tiered system like unreal or whatever:

        • Below a certain threshold no %
        • After the next mark 5%
        • Next go to 10% . . . Repeat up to 30%. Sony will cough up immediately. Smaller devs may never get hit or may get hit pretty easily for a while.
      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        18 hours ago

        They’d have to start doing vetting for that…

        All the slop games are “indie” or at least would start to be structured that way to lower their barrier of entry.

        • chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Maybe having a minimum where the sales don’t take a cut? That way slop that doesn’t sale much doesn’t benefit, but when a good indie comes along that sales well it would make a difference.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Whatever limit you try to set, that’s what the AI slop will aim to meet.

            It’s just something that can’t be automated, at the end of the day every online market needs a human to whitelist new products and review bait and switches, or the market will flood with junk.

            But no one wants to pay for that human level review.

            And I know, it may cause delays, but most Indie game do not only beta but alpha builds to fund development. I bought BG3 like 2 years before release because it made Act 1 immediately playable, it’s not even just an Indie dev thing.

            So even if it takes a full year, real developers would just register early in the process. The slop tho won’t stay topical because they’re not being pumped out in an afternoon.