• Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Where I live the cheapest 9070 (non XT) costs USD 635, and this is sort of a special price (albeit it could become base in a few months). Median competitive price is closer to USD 700+.

    Cheapest 5060 (8GB) is around USD 340 (median competitive is close).

    5060 Ti (16 GB) is around USD 550 (median competitive is close).

    AMD in my country is no go outside of some older, super low end SKUs (but you can also get better Nvidia cards second hand).

    I don’t care about brands, but where I live AMD is not really competitive (assuming like for like software support).

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        No worries, I get that.

        I am just saying globally prices are more variable. I can’t speak for EU specifically, but our prices generally track EU (more so than US).

        AMD needs to compete directly with Nvidia, but they won’t since GPUs are a (US) government backed oligopoly.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          For the most part, I really do think AMD is trying to compete with Nvidia as best they can, in as many ways as they can, but Nvidia is simply utterly dominant and huge.

          They have very usable alternatives for almost everything Nvidia does, their cards are way, way easier to use on Linux due to being way more open with their drivers and such…

          Maybe, maybe, depending on exactly how the coming implosion of the US AI bubble plays out, they might be able to gain some ground against Nvidia… but that is an exceptionally complicated scenario to try to predict in any real detail.