Plex has confirmed that it will require a Remote Watch Pass or Plex Pass for remote streaming on its TV apps. The change is going into effect for the Roku app first, followed by all other TV apps and third-party clients in 2026.

Earlier this year, Plex increased its pricing for Plex Pass and stopped supporting all options for free remote streaming in the Plex apps, such as adding a custom server connection in the app settings. The company said at the time, “The reality is that we need more resources to continue putting forth the best personal media experience, and as a result, we will no longer offer remote playback as a free feature.” That’s also when Plex introduced the Remote Watch Pass as a less expensive way to enable remote streaming again.

Plex is now rolling out the remote watch changes to its Roku TV app. If you have Plex Pass, or the owner of the server you’re streaming from has Plex Pass, you don’t need to do anything. Otherwise, if you are streaming on a different network from the server’s home network, you need Plex Pass or Remote Watch Pass.

    • excursion22@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      I have a lifetime pass and switched to Jellyfin years ago. Plex shoving their streaming content down my throat while putting my local libraries in the most tedious spots to access in the menus was a very quick turn off.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I have a lifetime pass and stopped using it. I got my money’s worth over the years. No regrets.

      • brewery@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Same. I finally switched over to jellyfin recently as it was low down on a long list of stuff I want to do, let alone need to do. I feel like I got my worth and if things mess up with jellyfin, I’ve got a temporary backup option to spin up without having to give a single penny more. Fingers crossed, no more of my data either seeing as it’s all uninstalled.

    • turdas@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Abandoning streaming services only to become a serf of another commercial subscription service seems like such a bizarre move that I really don’t understand how Plex users even exist.

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Wow, could you get any more condescending? We bought a product (10+ years ago in my case) and it still works great. Why would I switch to an inferior service, just because the FREE version of the product I already bought got worse?

        This has no impact on anyone that actually paid for Plex.

        With this move the free version of Plex got downgraded, to now have feature parity with Jellyfin. Meaning a VPN is required if you want to access your media on the go

        • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          This has no impact on anyone that actually paid for Plex.

          Yet.

          They’re going down the pathway to enshittification and very few companies that start down that dark path turn away before they destroy everything good they’d made for everyone, free and paid alike. Maybe that won’t happen here, but from all of the times I’ve seen that same song and dance, I would be finding alternatives to switch to, personally. But, it’s obviously up to you to decide your own comfort level if you want to start now or wait to see how far they go

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Privacy for me. When they where sending out emails about what you watched. Kind of made the we don’t know what’s on your server line a lie. So how could I trust them. I still expect a massive sting where they have to tell the MPAA or something who has pirated content and they go after people. Surprised it hasn’t happened yet seems so obvious.

        • turdas@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I’m not sure if you’re joking or not, but you can remotely stream from Jellyfin without using a VPN.

          • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            You CAN, but you really shouldn’t. Even the documentation says as much. The Jellyfin server is way to insecure to expose it to the open internet. In reality you can’t safely use Jellyfin remotely without a vpn

            • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 minutes ago

              Oh no, someone else could possibly play media from my media server, if they have the exact link for it!

              Yea, not ideal, but not exactly the end of the world.

            • Auli@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              What problems? The ones that everyone keeps posting which are not a big deal. Sure they should get fixed and a lot of them have been.

            • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 hours ago

              ‘I paid for this shit, and I will not allow it to be disrespected’. Sounds too much like Microsoft and Google apologists.

              • brewery@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                This is good to know, thanks for sharing. I’ve only got it local for now after installing at the weekend and wasn’t sure how secure it was for external access.

                • Pika@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  54 minutes ago

                  I’m just chiming in to say that while the documentation gives you information on how to do external access, there are multiple issues open on the github about unauthenticated endpoints that if you know what is on the server already, you can confirm that it’s there

                  So I wouldn’t use a standard naming convention because using that knowledge, someone who cares could use common names that could be on the server, followed by common standards of formats they would be in, and be able to confirm it’s their via the end points.

    • Skunk@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 hours ago

      What do you mean?

      To me the problem would be modifying the lifetime pass or simply removing it (for new customers) in favor of a fucking subscription only.

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I would be very surprised if they don’t go there eventually, and I’d even bet they’ll try at some point to force lifetime pass owners to switch to subscription

        If you ever think you’ve found a corpo that can be trusted, no you haven’t

        • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 minutes ago

          Exactly.

          Practically every piece of “lifetime” software I’ve paid for has gone this route.