ugjka@lemmy.ugjka.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 个月前One man's trash is another man's garbagelemmy.ugjka.netimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up11.21K
arrow-up11.21KimageOne man's trash is another man's garbagelemmy.ugjka.netugjka@lemmy.ugjka.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 个月前message-square56fedilink
minus-squarebampop@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-23 个月前just like Windows itself ( correction : Windows peaked 2009 - 2012 )
minus-squareLost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 个月前Agree on 1998, disagree on second best. 1995 was second best.
minus-squareKyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 个月前2001 for me. It was colourful and round, didn’t feel like a boring square box. While XP wasn’t always the most stable, it was a good OS.
minus-square[object Object]@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 个月前2006 is actually close to MacOS’ trash icons, which indeed always looked way better.
minus-squareWolfLink@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 个月前I think for the Mac icons here I like the 2001 variant.
minus-square[object Object]@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 个月前Yeah, that was what I’m most familiar with, and it felt neat as heck. 2014 is probably part of overall change away from Jobs’ skeuomorphism to glass texture that Jony Ive likes.
It peaked in 2006
just like Windows itself ( correction : Windows peaked 2009 - 2012 )
'98 is best.
2015 is second best.
Agree on 1998, disagree on second best.
1995 was second best.
Pixel art has my pixel heart.
2001 for me. It was colourful and round, didn’t feel like a boring square box. While XP wasn’t always the most stable, it was a good OS.
2006 is actually close to MacOS’ trash icons, which indeed always looked way better.
I think for the Mac icons here I like the 2001 variant.
Yeah, that was what I’m most familiar with, and it felt neat as heck. 2014 is probably part of overall change away from Jobs’ skeuomorphism to glass texture that Jony Ive likes.