• REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    To be fair they did move to a completely different CPU architecture and ARM is a hit or miss in gaming. Some games are fine, but then there are ones like Minecraft that ran better on my 10 year old Intel than on a top of the line M processor

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Is moving to ARM architecture anti-user? They easily accomplished the (correct me if I’m wrong) best energy efficiency between all available laptops in the market. Granted, it was never marketed for gaming.

        • SirActionSack@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Yes it’s anti-user because

          1: they seem to have broken compatibility with a lot of existing software

          2: they just use the efficiency improvements to make shit thinner.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Okay, so

            1. Rosetta 2 largely fixed that, for whereever it was feasible to fix. It came out as soon as ARM Macbooks did.

            2. They actually made their shit thicker. The M1 Pro/Max MBP is thicker than the 2016+ Intel ones were.

            I had an M1 Air, the battery lasted like 20 hours. Most I’ve gotten off any non-Apple laptop has been 6-7.