• Laser@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Arch is easier in my opinion, at least if you want to leverage the power NixOS can offer. A simple /etc/nixos/configuration.nix maybe not, but once you enter custom options / submodule territory and use stuff like lib.mapAttrs, I’d say NixOS is quite harder. Or just a more complex overrideAttrs. But then again, Arch doesn’t have an equivalent to that…

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I didn’t need to learn a programming language to install Arch btw. I’d definitely agree Nix is an unnecessary complication for very little gain for the average user.

      • Laser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Well, you don’t need to learn nix as a programming language for a simple installation, you can use it like a slightly different json, which the configuration.nix part was about. You can get the reproducibility aspect from just that, so I wouldn’t say you get no benefits at all without learning the language.

        There are more disadvantages (like time required to rebuild because you added a single package), so Arch is the better choice depending on preferences. Arch is a very good traditional distribution in my opinion, can’t go wrong with it